Diaz Editor vs PVsyst
€3,720 over 5 years — or €99 once.
Honest comparison. PVsyst is the academic gold standard for PV yield simulation. Diaz Editor wins on design speed + visual output + lifetime price. Bonus: Diaz Editor also handles electrical, HVAC, plumbing, and structural work — PVsyst only does PV simulation.
TL;DR
PVsyst is the academic gold standard for PV-yield simulation — great for utility-scale, bank-finance, and R&D. Diaz Editor is a design tool for installers who want to quote and execute fast. For permit work on residential + small commercial scale, Diaz Editor is enough. For utility-scale yield finance, PVsyst (or both).
When PVsyst is the right choice
- You submit yield reports to a bank for utility-scale financing.
- You work on a PhD thesis, R&D, or EPC tender with deep loss-budget requirements.
- You want to model tracker systems with diffuse + spectral + mismatch losses.
- You have 20-40 hours to learn the tool.
For those use-cases, PVsyst has been industry-standard since 1992. Nothing comes close.
When Diaz Editor fits better
- You sell and install — you don't have 40 hours for tool onboarding.
- Your work is residential or small commercial (0-100 kW).
- You want visual 3D output for client presentations (PVsyst is functional but not sales-ready).
- You want to design battery systems (PVsyst is primarily PV).
- You work in NL/ES and want local UI + EU permit formats.
Side-by-side: features that matter
| Feature | Diaz Editor | PVsyst |
|---|---|---|
| 3D roof design (visual) | ✓ (sales-ready) | — (basic 3D scene) |
| PV yield simulation | ✓ (PVWatts) | ✓ (industry-standard) |
| Loss-budget reporting (IAM/spectral/mismatch) | — | ✓ (deep) |
| Battery system design | ✓ (full) | — (basic) |
| Tracker shading model | — | ✓ |
| PDF permit pack export | ✓ | ✓ (technical report) |
| Panel + inverter library | 3,200+ | 10,000+ |
| Learning curve | ~2 hours | ~20-40 hours |
| Local language UI (NL/ES) | ✓ | ✓ (NL ja, ES ja) |
| No subscription | ✓ | — (yearly) |
Source: PVsyst public documentation + Diaz Editor v0.3 changelog. Updated May 2026.
Pricing over 5 years
PVsyst Premium
Diaz Editor — Founding Beta
Many installers use both: Diaz Editor for design + PVsyst for occasional utility-scale yield reports. €99 lifetime + PVsyst yearly only when you actually need it.
Workflow: PVsyst + Diaz Editor side-by-side
- Initial design + sale: Diaz Editor for 3D visualisation, client pitch, permit pack.
- Yield validation (only utility-scale or bank-finance): export BOM from Diaz Editor, import into PVsyst, run yield report.
- Execution: permit pack and BOM from Diaz Editor to your install team.
Honest verdict
For solo + SMB installers (residential + small commercial)
Diaz Editor is the right primary tool. Speed + visual output + lifetime pricing. PVsyst is overkill for an 8 kWp roof install.
For utility-scale, bank-finance, R&D
PVsyst remains essential. Loss-budget depth and tracker modelling can't be replaced. Diaz Editor doesn't try to.
Frequently asked questions
Is PVsyst more accurate than Diaz Editor?
For deep yield-loss modelling (IAM, spectral, mismatch, tracker shading), yes — PVsyst is the academic standard. For typical residential design where ±3% accuracy is acceptable, Diaz Editor's PVWatts-based simulation is sufficient and 10x faster to set up.
Can I use Diaz Editor for permit applications instead of PVsyst?
For residential and small commercial permit applications in NL/ES/EU, yes. Diaz Editor's PDF permit pack includes all standard items. PVsyst is required for some bank-financed utility-scale projects where deep simulation reports are part of the financing package.
Does Diaz Editor have shading analysis?
Diaz Editor v0.3 supports manual shade objects and horizon shading. PVsyst's near-shading and 3D obstruction modelling is more advanced. For residential roofs without nearby high obstacles, the difference in calculated yield is typically under 2%.
What's the learning curve difference?
PVsyst takes 20-40 hours to learn properly. Diaz Editor is designed for 2-hour onboarding. For solo installers, time-to-quote matters as much as simulation rigour.
Can I export from PVsyst into Diaz Editor?
PVsyst exports project reports as PDF and CSV (BOM, hourly results). Diaz Editor accepts these as reference, but the system geometry must be re-traced. A direct PVsyst project import is on the v0.6 roadmap.
Try Diaz Editor — €99 lifetime
100 founding spots. No subscription. 3 device seats.
Claim founding spot — €99Other comparisons
What you get for €99
One-time. Lifetime. 3 seats. No subscription.
-
Diaz Editor Pro — lifetime license for your full workday
€997 -
3 seats — you + your foreman + your work-prep
+€600 - All trades in one tool — building, carpentry, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, solar 4 tools saved
- DXF + IFC import — works with any architect, contractor, or installer Included
- 1-click PDF export — quote, work-drawing, and BOM in one pack Included
- DXF + CNC export for the workshop — cut lists, sheet layouts, mill paths Included
- All future updates — v0.4, v0.5, v0.6... Included
- Founding-member feedback board — your voice on the roadmap Exclusive
Built for self-employed tradespeople + small teams (1-10 people). Not for architects or utility-scale engineering — AutoCAD and Aurora are better at those.
Regular price (after founding):
€997 €99 today
100 spots total. Stripe checkout. Instant download after payment.
Related guides
- CAD-software voor ZZP-timmerman [NL]
- Offerte-software voor aannemers [NL]
- 3D-tekenen voor werkvoorbereider bouw [NL]
- CAD voor klein bouwbedrijf (5-25 pers) [NL]
- Solar design software voor Nederlandse installateurs [NL]
- Thuisbatterij-ontwerp & saldering 2027 [NL]
- NEN 1010 zonnesysteem-eisen [NL]
- Software CAD para autónomos en construcción [ES]
- Software de diseño solar para instaladores en España [ES]
- CAD gratis para instaladores fotovoltaicos [ES]
- Diseño solar autoconsumo (RD 244/2019) [ES]
- CAD software for small construction business [EN]
- Multi-discipline solar design workflow [EN]
- CAD-Software für Handwerker [DE]